<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Journal of Biotherapy</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of Biotherapy</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Российский биотерапевтический журнал</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1726-9784</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">1726-9792</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Publishing House ABV Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1294</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17650/1726-9784-2022-21-1-10-20</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>REVIEWS</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОБЗОРЫ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject></subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Somatostatin receptors: localization and imagining methods (review)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Рецепторы к соматостатину: локализация и методы визуализации (обзор литературы)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3034-750X</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Pankratova</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Панкратова</surname><given-names>Е. А.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Elizaveta Antonovna Pankratova</p><p>Bld. 2, 8 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991 Russia</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Елизавета Антоновна Панкратова</p><p>Россия, 119991 Москва, ул. Трубецкая, 8, стр. 2</p></bio><email>paneliant@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1237-1207</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Shprakh</surname><given-names>Z. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шпрах</surname><given-names>З. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Bld. 2, 8 Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991 Russia</p><p>24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115478, Russia</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Россия, 119991 Москва, ул. Трубецкая, 8, стр. 2</p><p>Россия, 115478 Москва, Каширское шоссе, 24</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГАОУ ВО Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И. М. Сеченова Минздрава России (Сеченовский Университет)</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр онкологии им. Н. Н. Блохина» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2022-04-14" publication-format="electronic"><day>14</day><month>04</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>10</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-04-12"><day>12</day><month>04</month><year>2022</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2022-04-12"><day>12</day><month>04</month><year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://bioterapevt.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/1294">https://bioterapevt.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/1294</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) is a rare pathology characterized by dysfunction of the pituitary gland and endocrine glands. The survival prognosis depends on the stage of the disease at which the malignant growth was detected.</p><p>The study objective was to summarize information on the methods of early diagnosis of NETs and antitumor therapy using peptide hypothalamic hormone somatostatin analogues.</p><p>The review provides a chronological analysis of studies of the expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) in different tissues and organs, methods of their visualization and quantitative determination over 50 years. The expression of SSTRs was revealed on NET cell membranes. The history of SSTRs study dates back to 1972, when somatostatin was first isolated and its structure established. Later, the peptide therapeutic activity in the treatment of NET, realized through somatostatin receptors, was discovered, and a number of somatostatin analogues were synthesized. Five main types of SSTRs are known, including subtypes which are expressed in characteristic volumes in the corresponding pathologies. Determining the expression of SSTRs provides diagnosis and staging of malignant neoplasms. Now the regulation of tumor growth is carried out by synthetic somatostatin analogues. SSTRs imaging is an important stage in planning NET therapy with drugs of this pharmacological group. Clinical studies of the therapy of tumors of various organs and tissues, in vitro and in vivo imaging are being carried out, methods for detecting SSTRs are being studied and compared.</p><p>A retrospective analysis of the methods used to visualize SSTRs and diagnose and treat NETs is presented. It has been shown that positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography, using SSTRs-binding radioligands is the safest and most accurate method for visualizing SSTRs and diagnosing NETs.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Нейроэндокринные опухоли (НЭО) – редко встречающаяся патология, характеризующаяся нарушениями работы гипофиза и желез внутренней секреции. Прогноз выживаемости пациентов с НЭО зависит от стадии заболевания, на которой был обнаружен злокачественный рост.</p><p><bold>Цель работы </bold>– обобщить информацию о методах ранней диагностики НЭО и их терапии с использованием аналогов пептидного гипоталамического гормона соматостатина. Проведен хронологический анализ исследований экспрессии рецепторов к соматостатину (SSTRs) в разных тканях и органах, методов их визуализации и количественного определения за последние 50 лет.</p><p>По данным исследований, на мембранах клеток НЭО выявлена экспрессия SSTRs. История изучения SSTRs берет свое начало в 1972 г., когда впервые был выделен соматостатин и установлена его структура. Позднее обнаружена терапевтическая активность пептида при лечении НЭО, реализуемая через SSTRs, и синтезирован ряд аналогов соматостатина. Известно 5 основных типов SSTRs, включающих в себя подтипы, которые экспрессируются в характерных объемах при соответствующих патологиях. Выявление экспрессии SSTRs обеспечивает диагностику и определение стадий развития злокачественного новообразования. В настоящее время регуляцию роста опухоли проводят синтетическими аналогами соматостатина. Визуализация SSTRs – важный этап планирования терапии НЭО препаратами этой фармакологической группы. Проводятся клинические исследования терапии опухолей разных органов и тканей, визуализация in vitro и in vivo, изучаются и сравниваются методы обнаружения SSTRs.</p><p>В статье представлен ретроспективный анализ методов, используемых для визуализации SSTRs, диагностики и терапии НЭО. Показано, что метод позитронно-эмиссионной томографии, совмещенной с компьютерной томографией, с использованием SSTRs-связывающих радиолигандов является наиболее безопасным и точным для визуализации SSTRs и диагностики НЭО.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>somatostatin</kwd><kwd>neuroendocrine tumors</kwd><kwd>somatostatin receptors</kwd><kwd>scintigraphy</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>соматостатин</kwd><kwd>нейроэндокринные опухоли</kwd><kwd>соматостатиновые рецепторы</kwd><kwd>сцинтиграфия</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Vale W., Brazeau P., Grant G. et al. [Preliminary observations on the mechanism of action of somatostatin, a hypothalamic factor inhibiting the secretion of growth hormone (In French)]. C R Acad Hebd Seances Acad Sci D 1972;275(25):2913–6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Basile M., Celi S., Parisi A. et al. Somatostatin in the treatment of severe gastrointestinal bleeding from peptic origin. A multicentric controlled trial. Ital J Surg Sci 1984;14(1):31–5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Bousquet C., Lasfargues C., Chalabi M. et al. Clinical review: Current scientific rationale for the use of somatostatin analogs and mTOR inhibitors in neuroendocrine tumor therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97(3):727–37. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2011-2088.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Pisarek H., Pawlikowski M., Marchlewska M. et al. An immunohistochemical investigation of the expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes - should therapeutic trials be performed to determine the efficacy of somatostatin analogs in treating advanced thyroid malignances? Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2015;123(6):342–6. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1548825.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Londong W., Angerer M., Kutz K. et al. Diminishing efficacy of octreotide (SMS 201-995) on gastric functions of healthy subjects during one-week administration. Gastroenterology 1989;96(3):713–22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Strulovici B., Stadel J.M., Lefkowitz R.J. Adenylate-cyclasecoupled betaadrenergic receptors. In: Poste G., Crooke S.T., eds. Mechanisms of receptor regulation. New York, London: Plenum, 1985. P. 279–294.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Hicks R.J., Jackson P., Kong G. et al. 64Cu-SARTATE PET Imaging of Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Demonstrates High Tumor Uptake and Retention, Potentially Allowing Prospective Dosimetry for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. J Nucl Med 2019;60(6):777–85. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.217745.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Slashchuk K.Yu., Rumyantsev P.O., Degtyarev M.V. et al. Molecular imaging of neuroendocrine tumors with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SPECT/CT) with 99mTc-tectrotide. Meditsinskaya radiologiya i radiatsionnaya bezopasnost = Medical Radiology and Radiation Safety 2020;65(2):44–9. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Слащук К.Ю., Румянцев П.О., Дегтярев М.В. и др. Молекулярная визуализация нейроэндокринных опухолей при соматостатин-рецепторной сцинтиграфии (ОФЭКТ/КТ) c 99mTc-тектротидом. Медицинская радиология и радиационная безопасность 2020;65(2):44–9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Krenning E.P., Bakker W.H., Kooij P.P. et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with indium-111-DTPA-D-Phe-1- octreotide in man: metabolism, dosimetry and comparison with iodine- 123-Tyr-3-octreotide. J Nucl Med 1992;33(5):652–8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Krenning E.P., Valkema R., Kooij P.P. et al. Scintigraphy and radionuclide therapy with [indium-111-labelleddiethyl triamine penta-acetic acid-DPhe1]-octreotide. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999;31(Suppl 2):S219–23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Zissimopoulos A., Karpouzis A., Kouskoukis C. Iotandium-111 pentetreotide scintigraphy and CT scans after 3 years in the follow-up of patients with malignant melanoma. Hell J Nucl Med 2009;12(2):142–5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Modlin I.M., Cornelius E., Lawton G.P. et al. Use of an isotopic somatostatin receptor probe to image gut endocrine tumors. Arch Surg 1995;130(4): 367–73; discussion 373–4. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430040029003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Jamar F., Fiasse R., Leners N. et al. Somatostatin receptor imaging with indium-111-pentetreotide in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: safety, efficacy and impact on patient management. J Nucl Med 1995;36(4):542–9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Diaz M., Kahaly G., Mühlbach A. et al. [Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in endocrine orbitopathy (In German)]. Rofo 1994;161(6):484–8. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1032573.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Postema P.T., De Herder W.W., Reubi J.C. et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in non-medullary thyroid cancer. Digestion 1996;57(Suppl 1):36–7. DOI: 10.1159/000201391.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Berenger N., Moretti J.L., Boaziz C. et al. Somatostatin receptor imaging in small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A(8):1429–31. DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(96)00078-0.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Halmos G., Sun B., Schally A.V. et al. Human ovarian cancers express somatostatin receptors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85(10):3509–12. DOI: 10.1210/jcem.85.10.3509.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Zimmer T., Stölzel U., Liehr R.M. et al. [Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of insulinoma and gastrinoma (In German)]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1995;120(4):87–93. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1047641.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Murabe H., Shimatsu A., Ihara C. et al. Expression of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtypes in pituitary adenomas: quantitative analysis of SSTR2 mRNA by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. J Neuroendocrinol 1996;8(8):605–10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Kurtaran A., Leimer M., Kaserer K. et al. Combined use of 111In-DTPA-DPhe-1-octreotide (OCT) and 123I-vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) in the localization diagnosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). Nucl Med Biol 1996;23(4):503–7. DOI: 10.1016/0969-8051(96)00031-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Taal B.G., Hoefnagel C.A., Valdés Olmos R.A. et al. Combined diagnostic imaging with 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine and 111In-pentetreotide in carcinoid tumours. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A(11):1924–32. DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(96)00241-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt M., Scheidhauer K., Luyken C. et al. Somatostatin receptor imaging in intracranial tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25(7):675–86. DOI: 10.1007/s002590050269.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Kopf D., Bockisch A., Steinert H. et al. Octreotide scintigraphy and catecholamine response to an octreotide challenge in malignant phaeochromocytoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1997;46(1):39–44. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1997.d01-1738.x.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Garin E., Devillers A., Le Cloirec J. et al. Use of indium-111 pentetreotide somatostatin receptor scintigraphy to detect recurrent thyroid carcinoma in patients without detectable iodine uptake. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25(7):687–94. DOI: 10.1007/s002590050270.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Valli N., Catargi B., Ronci N. et al. Evaluation of indium-111 pentetreotide somatostatin receptor scintigraphy to detect recurrent thyroid carcinoma in patients with negative radioiodine scintigraphy. Thyroid 1999;9(6):583–9. DOI: 10.1089/thy.1999.9.583.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Bernà L., Chico A., Matías-Guiu X. et al. Use of somatostatin analogue scintigraphy in the localization of recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25(11):1482–8. DOI: 10.1007/s002590050325.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Kouroumalis E., Skordilis P., Thermos K. et al. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with octreotide: a randomised controlled study. Gut 1998;42(3):442–7. DOI: 10.1136/gut.42.3.442.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Virgolini I., Britton K., Buscombe J. et al. In- and Y-DOTA-lanreotide: results and implications of the MAURITIUS trial. Semin Nucl Med 2002;32(2):148–55. DOI: 10.1053/snuc.2002.31565.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Fletcher W.S., Lum S.S., Nance R.W. et al. The current status of somatostatin receptors in malignant melanoma. Yale J Biol Med 1997;70(5–6):561–3. PMID: 9825484.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Ferone D., Pivonello R., Van Hagen P.M. et al. Age-related decrease of somatostatin receptor number in the normal human thymus. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2000;279(4):E791–8. DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.2000.279.4.E791.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Pichler R., Maschek W., Crespillo C. et al. Is there a gender difference of somatostatin-receptor density in the human brain? Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2002;23(5–6):440–1. PMID: 12500167.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Waldherr C., Schumacher T., Pless M. et al. Radiopeptide transmitted internal irradiation of non-iodophil thyroid cancer and conventionally untreatable medullary thyroid cancer using. Nucl Med Commun 2001;22(6):673–8. DOI: 10.1097/00006231-200106000-00011.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Fjällskog M.L., Ludvigsen E., Stridsberg M. et al. Expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes 1 to 5 in tumor tissue and intratumoral vessels in malignant endocrine pancreatic tumors. Med Oncol 2003;20(1):59–67. DOI: 10.1385/MO:20:1:59.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Sampedro-Núñez M., Luque R.M., Ramos-Levi A.M. et al. Presence of sst5TMD4, a truncated splice variant of the somatostatin receptor subtype 5, is associated to features of increased aggressiveness in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Oncotarget 2016;7(6): 6593–608. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.6565.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Van Den Bossche B., Dʼhaeninck E., De Vos F. et al. Oestrogen-mediated regulation of somatostatin receptor expression in human breast cancer cell lines assessed with 99mTc-depreotide. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31(7):1022–30. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-004-1500-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Becherer A., Szabó M., Karanikas G. et al. Imaging of advanced neuroendocrine tumors with (18)F-FDOPA PET. J Nucl Med 2004;45(7):1161–7. PMID: 15235062.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Saga T., Shimatsu A., Koizumi K. et al. Morphological imaging in the localization of neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors found by somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Acta Radiol 2005;46(3):227–32. DOI: 10.1080/02841850510021003.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Stahl A., Meisetschläger G., Schottelius M. et al. [123I]Mtr-TOCA, a radioiodinated and carbohydrated analogue of octreotide: scintigraphic comparison with [111In]octreotide. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33(1):45–52. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-005-1872-2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Yoshihara A., Isozaki O., Hizuka N. et al. Expression of type 5 somatostatin receptor in TSH-secreting pituitary adenomas: a possible marker for predicting long-term response to octreotide therapy. Endocr J 2007;54(1):133–8. DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.k06-133.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>de Waal E.G., Slart R.H., Vellenga E. Is FDG PET a better imaging tool than somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in patients with relapsing multiple myeloma? Clin Nucl Med 2012;37(10):939–42. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e3182638e2f.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Rodrigues M., Traub-Weidinger T., Li S. et al. Comparison of 111In-DOTADPhe1-Tyr3-octreotide and 111In-DOTAlanreotide scintigraphy and dosimetry in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33(5):532–40. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-005-0020-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Gabriel M., Decristoforo C., Kendler D. et al. 68Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide PET in neuroendocrine tumors: comparison with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and CT. J Nucl Med 2007;48(4):508–18. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.106.035667.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Luboldt W., Zöphel K., Wunderlich G. et al. Visualization of somatostatin receptors in prostate cancer and its bone metastases with Ga-68-DOTATOC PET/ CT. Mol Imaging Biol 2010;12(1):78–84. DOI: 10.1007/s11307-009-0230-3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Freudenberg L.S., Gauler T., Görges R. et al. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in advanced renal cell carcinoma. Results of a phase II-trial of somatostatine analogue therapy in patients with advanced RCC. Nuklearmedizin 2008;47(3):127–31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Taboada G.F., Neto L.V., Luque R.M. et al. Impact of gsp oncogene on the mRNA content for somatostatin and dopamine receptors in human somatotropinomas. Neuroendocrinology 2011;93(1):40–7. DOI: 10.1159/000322040.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Romiti A., Di Rocco R., Milione M. et al. Somatostatin receptor subtype 2 A (SSTR2A) and HER2 expression in gastric adenocarcinoma. Anticancer Res 2012;32(1):115–9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Casar-Borota O., Heck A., Schulz S. et al. Expression of SSTR2a, but not of SSTRs 1, 3, or 5 in somatotroph adenomas assessed by monoclonal antibodies was reduced by octreotide and correlated with the acute and long-term effects of octreotide. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98(11):E1730–9. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-2145.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Woelfl S., Bogner S., Huber H. et al. Expression of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 and subtype 5 in thyroid malignancies. Nuklearmedizin 2014;53(5):179–85. DOI: 10.3413/Nukmed-0646-14-02.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Brunner P., Jörg A.C., Glatz K. et al. The prognostic and predictive value of sstr2-immunohistochemistry and sstr2-targeted imaging in neuroendocrine tumors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;44(3):468–75. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3486-2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Gronkiewicz Z., Kukwa W., Krolicki L. et al. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET in juvenile angiofibroma. Future Oncol 2016;12(12):1483–91. DOI: 10.2217/fon-2015-0074.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Kunikowska J., Lewington V., Krolicki L. Optimizing Somatostatin Receptor Imaging in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors: The Impact of 99mTc-HYNICTOC SPECT/SPECT/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>CT Versus 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT Upon Clinical Management. Clin Nucl Med 2017;42(12):905–11. DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001877.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Nicolas G.P., Schreiter N., Kaul F. et al. Sensitivity Comparison of 68Ga-OPS202 and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Phase II Imaging Study. J Nucl Med 2018;59(6):915–21. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.199760.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Adams L.C., Bressem K.K., Brangsch J. et al. Quantitative 3D Assessment of 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Assess Imaging Markers for Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Preliminary Results. J Nucl Med 2020;61(7):1021–7. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.234062.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Hope T.A., Calais J., Zhang L. et al. 111In-Pentetreotide Scintigraphy Versus 68Ga-DOTATATE PET: Impact on Krenning Scores and Effect of Tumor Burden. J Nucl Med 2019;60(9):1266–9. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.223016.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Delpassand E.S., Ranganathan D., Wagh N. et al. 64Cu-DOTATATE PET/ CT for Imaging Patients with Known or Suspected Somatostatin Receptor-Positive Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results of the First U.S. Prospective, Reader- Masked Clinical Trial. J Nucl Med 2020;61(6):890–6. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.236091.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Lechner M., Schartinger V.H., Steele C.D. et al. Somatostatin receptor 2 expression in nasopharyngeal cancer is induced by Epstein Barr virus infection: impact on prognosis, imaging and therapy. Nat Commun 2021;12(1):117. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20308-8.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
