Multiple myeloma: plasma cell immunophenotype and monitoring of minimal residual disease after induction therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- Authors: Kupriyshina N.A.1, Chulkova S.V.1,2, Semenova A.A.1, Kolbatskaya O.P.1, Tumyan G.S.1, Zabotina Т.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
- N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
- Issue: Vol 25, No 2 (2026)
- Pages: 64-71
- Section: ORIGINAL REPORTS
- Published: 15.07.2026
- URL: https://bioterapevt.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/1583
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9784-2026-25-2-64-71
- ID: 1583
Cite item
Abstract
Background. Minimal residual disease (MRD) is the presence of a tumor clone in the bone marrow that can prevent remission during treatment. The immunophenotype of MM cells may be different, so it is necessary to understand the spectrum of markers that allow differentiating abnormal plasma cells (PCs). Monitoring MRD can influence the choice of patient management tactics.
Aim. Analysis of the immunophenotype of myeloma cells and assessment of the frequency of MRD during treatment.
Materials and methods. The study included 56 MM patients, the average age was 55 years. Induction chemotherapy was carried out according to the VRD scheme (including lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone), autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT). The MOB status was assessed by multicolored flow cytometry using a Becton Dickinson FACSCanto II cytofluorimeter (Becton Diskinson, USA), Kaluza Analysis v. 2.1 (Beckman Coulter, Inc., USA). Monoclonal antibodies of clusters of differentiation (CD) were used: CD45, CD19, CD27, CD56, CD28, CD38, CD117, CD19, CD81, immunoglobulin light chains κ / λ, nuclear dye 7-aminoactinomycin D (Becton Diskinson, USA).
Results. The most common MM immunophenotype was aberrant in the absence of CD19 and CD27, reduced expression of CD38, and abnormal presence of CD56 was noted. There is aberrancy in CD27 / CD117 / CD81. Most often, the immunophenotype of PCs corresponded to CD19–CD45–CD56+, noted in 46.4 % of cases. The frequency of MRD negativity after induction therapy is 35.7 %, after auto-HSCT – 56.7 %. A 1.3-fold decrease in the number of PCs in the bone marrow after auto-HSCT was established. Conversion after auto-HSCT of MRD positive cases (before transplantation of PCs more than 0.01 %, but less than 0.1 %) was detected in 53 % of patients.
Conclusion. The MRD status in MM is assessed based on the aberrant expression of the main and additional plasma cell markers. At the stage of induction therapy and after auto-HSCT, the MRD status differs and there is a conversion of MRD-positive cases to negative ones. Monitoring MRD can be useful for choosing the tactics of managing patients with MM.
About the authors
Natalya A. Kupriyshina
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: chulkova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8509-0954
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Svetlana V. Chulkova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia; N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University), Ministry of Health of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: chulkova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4412-5019
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522; Build. 6, 1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow 117513
Anastasiya A. Semenova
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: chulkova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4951-3053
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Olga P. Kolbatskaya
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: chulkova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8493-9012
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Gayane S. Tumyan
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: chulkova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5771-4413
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
Тatiana N. Zabotina
N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: chulkova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7631-5699
Russian Federation, 24 Kashirskoe Shosse, Moscow 115522
References
- Rajkumar S.V., Dimopoulos M.A., Palumbo A. et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 2014;15(12): e538–48. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5
- Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2021 году. Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, А.О. Шахзадовой. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2022. 239 с. State of oncological care in Russia in 2021. Eds.: А.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, A.O. Shachzadova. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena – filial FGBU “NMITS radiologii” Minzdrava Rossii, 2022. 239 p. (In Russ.).
- Rajkumar S.V. Multiple myeloma: 2016 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2016;91(7):719–34. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24402
- Munshi N.C., Avet-Loiseau H., Anderson K.C. et al. A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Adv 2020;4(23):5988–99. doi: 10.1182/BLOODADVANCES.2020002827
- Rawstron A., Orfao A., Beksac M. et al. Report of the European Myeloma Network on multiparametric flow cytometry in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Haematologica 2008;93(3): 431–8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.11080
- Flores-Montero J., de Tute R., Paiva B. et al. Immunophenotype of normal vs. myeloma plasma cells: toward antibody panel specifications for MRD detection in multiple myeloma. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2015;90(1):61–72. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21265
- Kristinsson S.Y., Landgren O., Dickman P.W. et al. Patterns of survival in multiple myeloma: a population-based study of patients diagnosed in Sweden from 1973 to 2003. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(15):1993–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0100
- Bertamini L., D’Agostino M., Gay F. MRD assessment in multiple myeloma: progress and challenges. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 2021;16(2):162–71. doi: 10.1007/s11899-021-00633-5
- Mina R., Oliva S., Boccadoro M. Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: state of the art and future perspectives. J Clin Med 2020;9(7):2142. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072142. Erratum in: J Clin Med 2020;9(8):E2630. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082630
- Paiva B., Vidriales M., Cervero J. et al. Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation. Blood 2008;112(10):4017–23. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-159624
Supplementary files

