Comparison of methods for assessing the immunogenicity of biological drugs based on monoclonal antibodies using the example of pembrolizumab

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. To ensure the safety and effectiveness of biological drugs, it is critically important to evaluate their immunogenicity. The most commonly used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has a number of limitations, so it is important to understand the possibilities of alternative approaches, for example, the biolayer interferometry (BSI) method.

Aim. Development, validation and comparison of two methods for screening assay in the context of assessing the immunogenicity of biological drugs based on monoclonal antibodies using the example of pembrolizumab with multiple intravenous administration to Macaca fascicularis.

Materials and methods. Immunogenicity was evaluated as part of a comparative study of toxicity and local tolerance of two drugs with International Nonproprietary Name pembrolizumab following repeated administration. Macaca fascicularis (3 groups of 3 males and 3 females in each) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of the experiment received intravenously a control substance (buffer solution), test drug (RPH-075, JSC R-Pharm, Russia) and reference drug (Keytruda®, MSD International GmbH, Ireland) at a dose 30 mg/kg. Serum samples, were collected pre-dose and on study days 15, 22, 29, and were tested for assessment of binding antibodies to pembrolizumab using two methods, bridging ELISA and BSI.

Results. During the development and testing of methods for binding antibodies (BAb) to pembrolizumab quantification in monkey’s blood serum of by the bridge ELISA and BSI assays, it was revealed that the bridge ELISA has greater sensitivity (12.3 and 419.7 ng/mL, respectively). Determination of BAb level to pembrolizumab by ELISA revealed immunogenicity in 4 out of 12 animals; when analyzing samples by BSI, an increasing of BAb concentration was detected in only one animal.

Conclusion. Bridging ELISA is more sensitive than BSI making it the preferred method for assessing of drugs with unknown or suspected low immunogenicity.

About the authors

Valeriia S. Chernyshenko

Research-and-manufacturing company “HOME OF PHARMACY”

Author for correspondence.
Email: chernyshenko.vs@doclinika.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-3246-3771
Russian Federation, 3 / 245 Zavodskaya St., Kuzmolovsky urban-type settlement, Vsevolzhsky district, Leningrad region 188663

Natalia M. Faustova

Research-and-manufacturing company “HOME OF PHARMACY”

Email: chernyshenko.vs@doclinika.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6866-5741
Russian Federation, 3 / 245 Zavodskaya St., Kuzmolovsky urban-type settlement, Vsevolzhsky district, Leningrad region 188663

Vera M. Kosman

Research-and-manufacturing company “HOME OF PHARMACY”

Email: chernyshenko.vs@doclinika.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9690-1935
Russian Federation, 3 / 245 Zavodskaya St., Kuzmolovsky urban-type settlement, Vsevolzhsky district, Leningrad region 188663

Marina V. Karlina

Research-and-manufacturing company “HOME OF PHARMACY”

Email: chernyshenko.vs@doclinika.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6292-8934
Russian Federation, 3 / 245 Zavodskaya St., Kuzmolovsky urban-type settlement, Vsevolzhsky district, Leningrad region 188663

Anna Yu. Romanenko

Research-and-manufacturing company “HOME OF PHARMACY”

Email: chernyshenko.vs@doclinika.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-7026-9245
Russian Federation, 3 / 245 Zavodskaya St., Kuzmolovsky urban-type settlement, Vsevolzhsky district, Leningrad region 188663

Marina N. Makarova

Research-and-manufacturing company “HOME OF PHARMACY”

Email: chernyshenko.vs@doclinika.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3176-6386
Russian Federation, 3 / 245 Zavodskaya St., Kuzmolovsky urban-type settlement, Vsevolzhsky district, Leningrad region 188663

Valery G. Makarov

Research-and-manufacturing company “HOME OF PHARMACY”

Email: chernyshenko.vs@doclinika.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2447-7888
Russian Federation, 3 / 245 Zavodskaya St., Kuzmolovsky urban-type settlement, Vsevolzhsky district, Leningrad region 188663

Anastasia A. Dmitrieva

Joint-Stock Company “R-Pharm”

Email: chernyshenko.vs@doclinika.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4743-6189
Russian Federation, Build. 1, 19 Berzarin St., Moscow 123154

Elena V. Shipaeva

Joint-Stock Company “R-Pharm”

Email: chernyshenko.vs@doclinika.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5953-984X
Russian Federation, Build. 1, 19 Berzarin St., Moscow 123154

Mikhail G. Chernobrovkin

Limited Liability Company “Research Lab”

Email: chernyshenko.vs@doclinika.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4909-598X
Russian Federation, Build. 1, 21 Annenskaya St., Moscow 127521

Victoria A. Postnikova

Limited Liability Company “Research Lab”

Email: chernyshenko.vs@doclinika.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-7505-5734
Russian Federation, Build. 1, 21 Annenskaya St., Moscow 127521

Olga V. Filon

Joint-Stock Company “R-Pharm”

Email: chernyshenko.vs@doclinika.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8735-7429
Russian Federation, Build. 1, 19 Berzarin St., Moscow 123154

Mikhail Yu. Samsonov

Joint-Stock Company “R-Pharm”

Email: chernyshenko.vs@doclinika.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2685-1623
Russian Federation, Build. 1, 19 Berzarin St., Moscow 123154

Vasiliy G. Ignatiev

Joint-Stock Company “R-Pharm”

Email: chernyshenko.vs@doclinika.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2818-6583
Russian Federation, Build. 1, 19 Berzarin St., Moscow 123154

References

  1. Pineda C., Castaneda H.G., Jacobs I.A. et al. Assessing the immunogenicity of biopharmaceutical. BioDrugs 2016;30(3):195–206. doi: 10.1007/s40259-016-0174-5
  2. Hosseini S., Vázquez-Villegas P., Rito-Palomares M., Martinez-Chapa S.O. Advantages, disadvantages and modifications of conventional ELISA. Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), SpringerBriefs in Forensic and Medical Bioinformatics. Singapore: Springer, 2018. P. 67–115. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-6766-2_5
  3. Choo S.; ForteBio. Converting an ELISA Assay into an Octet Quantitation Assay. Application Note. Sartorius, 2022. URL: https://www.sartorius.com/download/756478/converting-elisa-assay-into-octet-quantitation-assay-application-note-en-sartorius-data.pdf.
  4. Peters S., Kerr K.M., Stahel R. PD-1 blockade in advanced NSCLC: a focus on pembrolizumab. Cancer Treat Rev 2018;62:39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.10.002
  5. Al Hadidi S.A., Lee H.J. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2020;20(11):1275–82. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1830056
  6. Yamamoto S., Kato K. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of esophageal cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2020;20(10): 1143–50. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1792881
  7. Kosman V.M., Karlina M.V., Barybina T.N. et al. Comparative pharmacokinetics of pembrolizumab after single intravenous administration to Macaca fascicularis. Rossijskij bioterapevticeskij zurnal = Russian Journal of Biotherapy 2024;23(4):49–60. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17650/1726-9784-2024-23-4-49-60
  8. Watanabe T., Kiso M., Fukuyama S. at al. Characterization of H7N9 influenza A viruses isolated from humans. Nature 2013;501(7468):551–5. doi: 10.1038/nature12392
  9. Laurén A., Goodman J., Blaes J. et al. A strategic approach to nonclinical immunogenicity assessment: a recommendation from the European Bioanalysis Forum. Bioanalysis 2021;(7): 537–49. doi: 10.4155/bio-2021-0028
  10. Li J., Schantz A., Schwegler M., Shankar G. Detection of low-affinity anti-drug antibodies and improved drug tolerance in immunogenicity testing by Octet® biolayer interferometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2011;54(2):286–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2010.08.022
  11. Markwalter C.F., Jang I.K., Burton R.A. et al. Biolayer interferometry predicts ELISA performance of monoclonal antibody pairs for Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2. Anal Biochem 2017;534:10–3. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2017.07.010
  12. van Meer P.J., Kooijman M., Brinks V. et al. Immunogenicity of mAbs in non-human primates during nonclinical safety assessment. MAbs 2013;5(5):810–6. doi: 10.4161/mabs.25234
  13. Brinks V., Jiskoot W., Schellekens H. Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: the use of animal models. Pharm Res 2011;28(10):2379–85. doi: 10.1007/s11095-011-0523-5
  14. Hutchins B., Starling G.C., McCoy M.A. et al. Biophysical and immunological characterization and in vivo pharmacokinetics and toxicology in nonhuman primates of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab. Mol Cancer Ther 2020;19(6):1298–307. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0774
  15. Samoylenko I.V., Pokataev I.А., Zhukova L.G. et al. Study of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the biosimilar pembrolizumab RPH-075 compared to Keytruda® in patients with malignant neoplasms. Zlokachestvennye opukholi = Malignant Tumours 2024;14(1):56–66. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18027/2224-5057-2024-14-1-56-66
  16. van Vugt M.J.H., Stone J.A., De Greef R.H.J.M.M. et al. Immunogenicity of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced tumors. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0663-4

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 ABV-Press

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС77-53039 от  04.03.2013.